0.03/0.11 % Problem : theBenchmark.p : TPTP v0.0.0. Released v0.0.0. 0.03/0.12 % Command : run_E %s %d THM 0.11/0.33 % Computer : n023.cluster.edu 0.11/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 0.11/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz 0.11/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB 0.11/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 0.11/0.33 % CPULimit : 960 0.11/0.33 % WCLimit : 120 0.11/0.33 % DateTime : Tue Aug 9 06:19:43 EDT 2022 0.11/0.33 % CPUTime : 0.18/0.46 Running higher-order on 8 cores theorem proving 0.18/0.46 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover-ho --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=120 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 0.18/0.46 # Version: 3.0pre003-ho 0.18/0.47 # Preprocessing class: HSMSSMSSSSSNSSN. 0.18/0.47 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 120 seconds (960 total) 0.18/0.47 # Starting new_ho_11 with 600s (5) cores 0.18/0.47 # Starting sh5l with 120s (1) cores 0.18/0.47 # Starting new_ho_9 with 120s (1) cores 0.18/0.47 # Starting ho_unfolding_4 with 120s (1) cores 0.18/0.47 # new_ho_11 with pid 17140 completed with status 0 0.18/0.47 # Result found by new_ho_11 0.18/0.47 # Preprocessing class: HSMSSMSSSSSNSSN. 0.18/0.47 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 120 seconds (960 total) 0.18/0.47 # Starting new_ho_11 with 600s (5) cores 0.18/0.47 # No SInE strategy applied 0.18/0.47 # Search class: HGHSF-FFSM11-SSSFFSBN 0.18/0.47 # partial match(1): HGHSF-FFSF11-SSSFFSBN 0.18/0.47 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 600 seconds (600 total) 0.18/0.47 # Starting ehoh_best2_full_lfho with 325s (1) cores 0.18/0.47 # Starting new_ho_11 with 61s (1) cores 0.18/0.47 # Starting sh2lt with 55s (1) cores 0.18/0.47 # Starting sh2l with 55s (1) cores 0.18/0.47 # Starting lpo1_def_fix with 55s (1) cores 0.18/0.47 # sh2lt with pid 17150 completed with status 0 0.18/0.47 # Result found by sh2lt 0.18/0.47 # Preprocessing class: HSMSSMSSSSSNSSN. 0.18/0.47 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 120 seconds (960 total) 0.18/0.47 # Starting new_ho_11 with 600s (5) cores 0.18/0.47 # No SInE strategy applied 0.18/0.47 # Search class: HGHSF-FFSM11-SSSFFSBN 0.18/0.47 # partial match(1): HGHSF-FFSF11-SSSFFSBN 0.18/0.47 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 600 seconds (600 total) 0.18/0.47 # Starting ehoh_best2_full_lfho with 325s (1) cores 0.18/0.47 # Starting new_ho_11 with 61s (1) cores 0.18/0.47 # Starting sh2lt with 55s (1) cores 0.18/0.47 # Preprocessing time : 0.001 s 0.18/0.47 # Presaturation interreduction done 0.18/0.47 0.18/0.47 # Proof found! 0.18/0.47 # SZS status Theorem 0.18/0.47 # SZS output start CNFRefutation 0.18/0.47 thf(decl_22, type, holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI: $i > $o > $o). 0.18/0.47 thf(decl_23, type, lAnna_THFTYPE_i: $i). 0.18/0.47 thf(decl_24, type, lBen_THFTYPE_i: $i). 0.18/0.47 thf(decl_25, type, lBill_THFTYPE_i: $i). 0.18/0.47 thf(decl_26, type, lBob_THFTYPE_i: $i). 0.18/0.47 thf(decl_27, type, lMary_THFTYPE_i: $i). 0.18/0.47 thf(decl_28, type, lSue_THFTYPE_i: $i). 0.18/0.47 thf(decl_29, type, lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI: $i > $i). 0.18/0.47 thf(decl_30, type, likes_THFTYPE_IiioI: $i > $i > $o). 0.18/0.47 thf(decl_31, type, n2009_THFTYPE_i: $i). 0.18/0.47 thf(decl_32, type, parent_THFTYPE_IiioI: $i > $i > $o). 0.18/0.47 thf(con, conjecture, ?[X1:$i > $i > $o, X2:$i > $i > $o, X3:$i]:((holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ ((((X2 @ X3 @ lBill_THFTYPE_i)&(X1 @ X3 @ lAnna_THFTYPE_i))&~(((X2)=(X1))))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', con)). 0.18/0.47 thf(ax_004, axiom, (holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ ((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lBob_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', ax_004)). 0.18/0.47 thf(ax_003, axiom, (holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ ((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', ax_003)). 0.18/0.47 thf(ax_009, axiom, (holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ (~((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lMary_THFTYPE_i)))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', ax_009)). 0.18/0.47 thf(c_0_4, negated_conjecture, ~(?[X1:$i > $i > $o, X2:$i > $i > $o, X3:$i]:(((~((((X2 @ X3 @ lBill_THFTYPE_i)&(X1 @ X3 @ lAnna_THFTYPE_i))&((X2)!=(X1))))|(holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ $true))&((((X2 @ X3 @ lBill_THFTYPE_i)&(X1 @ X3 @ lAnna_THFTYPE_i))&((X2)!=(X1)))|(holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ $false))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(fool_unroll,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[con])])])). 0.18/0.47 thf(c_0_5, negated_conjecture, ![X7:$i > $i > $o, X8:$i > $i > $o, X9:$i]:((((((~(X8 @ X9 @ lBill_THFTYPE_i)|~(X7 @ X9 @ lAnna_THFTYPE_i)|((X8)=(X7))|(X8 @ X9 @ lBill_THFTYPE_i))&(~(holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ $false)|(X8 @ X9 @ lBill_THFTYPE_i)))&((~(X8 @ X9 @ lBill_THFTYPE_i)|~(X7 @ X9 @ lAnna_THFTYPE_i)|((X8)=(X7))|(X7 @ X9 @ lAnna_THFTYPE_i))&(~(holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ $false)|(X7 @ X9 @ lAnna_THFTYPE_i))))&((~(X8 @ X9 @ lBill_THFTYPE_i)|~(X7 @ X9 @ lAnna_THFTYPE_i)|((X8)=(X7))|((X8)!=(X7)))&(~(holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ $false)|((X8)!=(X7)))))&((~(X8 @ X9 @ lBill_THFTYPE_i)|~(X7 @ X9 @ lAnna_THFTYPE_i)|((X8)=(X7))|~(holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ $true))&(~(holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ $false)|~(holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ $true))))), inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_4])])])). 0.18/0.47 thf(c_0_6, axiom, ((~(likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lBob_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i)|(holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ $true))&((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lBob_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i)|(holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ $false))), inference(fool_unroll,[status(thm)],[ax_004])). 0.18/0.47 thf(c_0_7, negated_conjecture, ![X1:$i > $i > $o, X2:$i > $i > $o]:((~((holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ (~($true))))|((X1)!=(X2)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5])). 0.18/0.47 thf(c_0_8, plain, ((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lBob_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i)|(holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ (~($true)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6])). 0.18/0.47 thf(c_0_9, negated_conjecture, ~((holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ (~($true)))), inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_7])). 0.18/0.47 thf(c_0_10, plain, ((holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ (($true)))|~((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lBob_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6])). 0.18/0.47 thf(c_0_11, plain, (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lBob_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i), inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_8, c_0_9])). 0.18/0.47 thf(c_0_12, negated_conjecture, ![X1:$i > $i > $o, X2:$i > $i > $o, X3:$i]:((((X1)=(X2))|~((X1 @ X3 @ lBill_THFTYPE_i))|~((X2 @ X3 @ lAnna_THFTYPE_i))|~((holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ (($true)))))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5])). 0.18/0.47 thf(c_0_13, plain, (holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ (($true))), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_10, c_0_11])])). 0.18/0.47 thf(c_0_14, axiom, ((~(likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i)|(holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ $true))&((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i)|(holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ $false))), inference(fool_unroll,[status(thm)],[ax_003])). 0.18/0.47 thf(c_0_15, negated_conjecture, ![X1:$i > $i > $o, X2:$i > $i > $o, X3:$i]:((((X1)=(X2))|~((X2 @ X3 @ lAnna_THFTYPE_i))|~((X1 @ X3 @ lBill_THFTYPE_i)))), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_12, c_0_13])])). 0.18/0.47 thf(c_0_16, plain, ((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i)|(holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ (~($true)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_14])). 0.18/0.47 thf(c_0_17, plain, (((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lMary_THFTYPE_i)|(holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ $true))&(~(likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lMary_THFTYPE_i)|(holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ $false))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(fool_unroll,[status(thm)],[ax_009])])). 0.18/0.47 thf(c_0_18, negated_conjecture, ![X1:$i > $i > $o, X3:$i]:((((X1)=(^[Z0:$i, Z1:$i]:(($true))))|~((X1 @ X3 @ lBill_THFTYPE_i)))), inference(primitive_enumeration,[status(thm)],[c_0_15])). 0.18/0.47 thf(c_0_19, plain, (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i), inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_16, c_0_9])). 0.18/0.47 thf(c_0_20, plain, ((holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ (~($true)))|~((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lMary_THFTYPE_i))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_17])). 0.18/0.47 thf(c_0_21, negated_conjecture, ((^[Z0:$i, Z1:$i]:(($true)))=(likes_THFTYPE_IiioI)), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18, c_0_19])). 0.18/0.47 thf(c_0_22, plain, ~((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lMary_THFTYPE_i)), inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_20, c_0_9])). 0.18/0.47 thf(c_0_23, negated_conjecture, ![X3:$i, X6:$i]:((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ X3 @ X6)), inference(arg_cong,[status(thm)],[c_0_21])). 0.18/0.47 thf(c_0_24, plain, ($false), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_22, c_0_23])]), ['proof']). 0.18/0.47 # SZS output end CNFRefutation 0.18/0.47 # Parsed axioms : 23 0.18/0.47 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0 0.18/0.47 # Initial clauses : 40 0.18/0.47 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 15 0.18/0.47 # Initial clauses in saturation : 25 0.18/0.47 # Processed clauses : 43 0.18/0.47 # ...of these trivial : 4 0.18/0.47 # ...subsumed : 2 0.18/0.47 # ...remaining for further processing : 37 0.18/0.47 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 5 0.18/0.47 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0 0.18/0.47 # Backward-subsumed : 6 0.18/0.47 # Backward-rewritten : 6 0.18/0.47 # Generated clauses : 29 0.18/0.47 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 24 0.18/0.47 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0 0.18/0.47 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0 0.18/0.47 # Paramodulations : 6 0.18/0.47 # Factorizations : 0 0.18/0.47 # NegExts : 0 0.18/0.47 # Equation resolutions : 5 0.18/0.47 # Propositional unsat checks : 0 0.18/0.47 # Propositional check models : 0 0.18/0.47 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0 0.18/0.47 # Propositional clauses : 0 0.18/0.47 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0 0.18/0.47 # Propositional unsat core size : 0 0.18/0.47 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000 0.18/0.47 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000 0.18/0.47 # Propositional solver time : 0.000 0.18/0.47 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000 0.18/0.47 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000 0.18/0.47 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000 0.18/0.47 # Current number of processed clauses : 11 0.18/0.47 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 7 0.18/0.47 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0 0.18/0.47 # Negative unit clauses : 3 0.18/0.47 # Non-unit-clauses : 1 0.18/0.47 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 17 0.18/0.47 # ...number of literals in the above : 39 0.18/0.47 # Current number of archived formulas : 0 0.18/0.47 # Current number of archived clauses : 25 0.18/0.47 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 16 0.18/0.47 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 16 0.18/0.47 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0 0.18/0.47 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 11 0.18/0.47 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0 0.18/0.47 # BW rewrite match attempts : 8 0.18/0.47 # BW rewrite match successes : 7 0.18/0.47 # Condensation attempts : 0 0.18/0.47 # Condensation successes : 0 0.18/0.47 # Termbank termtop insertions : 1900 0.18/0.47 0.18/0.47 # ------------------------------------------------- 0.18/0.47 # User time : 0.005 s 0.18/0.47 # System time : 0.003 s 0.18/0.47 # Total time : 0.009 s 0.18/0.47 # Maximum resident set size: 1828 pages 0.18/0.47 0.18/0.47 # ------------------------------------------------- 0.18/0.47 # User time : 0.016 s 0.18/0.47 # System time : 0.014 s 0.18/0.47 # Total time : 0.031 s 0.18/0.47 # Maximum resident set size: 1732 pages 0.18/0.47 EOF